Rock Fracture
KNOWLEDGEBASE
  

Cataclastic Flow

Cataclastic deformation refers to a flow-like deformation of granular or crystalline materials produced by two micromechanical processes on the micro-scale: Grain fracture and pore collapse.

Grain fracturing (Figure 1) refers to the break of grains when the stress at a grain contact or grain contacts exceeds the strength of the grains or the fracture toughness (Gallagher, 1987; Du Bernard and Maerten, 2001). Grain fracturing leads to reduction of grain size (Figure 2 and Figure 3 (a,b)) and change of petrophysical properties of the aggregate (Figure 3(c,d)).

(a) Photo elastic experiments illustrating stress concentration at contacts of discs subjected to uniaxial compression. From Gallagher (1987). (b) Dynamic Element Modeling of stress localization in a grain subjected to uniaxial compression. From Du Bernard and Maerten (2001).Figure 1. (a) Photo elastic experiments illustrating stress concentration at contacts of discs subjected to uniaxial compression. From Gallagher (1987). (b) Dynamic Element Modeling of stress localization in a grain subjected to uniaxial compression. From Du Bernard and Maerten (2001).
Photomicrographs of shear bands with grain fracturing and comminution. (a) Courtesy of Xavier Du Bernard and Peter Eichhubl.Figure 2. Photomicrographs of shear bands with grain fracturing and comminution. (a) Courtesy of Xavier Du Bernard and Peter Eichhubl.
(a) Image of initial grain fractures in sandstone. (b) Grain size distribution in shear bands with varying amounts of strain compared with undeformed sandstone (Mair et al., 2000). (c) Plots showing the relationship between porosity and confining pressure for cemented as well as non-cemented granular material (Dvorkin and Nur, 1996). (d) Dependence of M-modulus (the bulk density of aggregate times the square of P-wave velocity) on porosity for various effective pressures (Dvorkin and Nur, 1996).Figure 3. (a) Image of initial grain fractures in sandstone. (b) Grain size distribution in shear bands with varying amounts of strain compared with undeformed sandstone (Mair et al., 2000). (c) Plots showing the relationship between porosity and confining pressure for cemented as well as non-cemented granular material (Dvorkin and Nur, 1996). (d) Dependence of M-modulus (the bulk density of aggregate times the square of P-wave velocity) on porosity for various effective pressures (Dvorkin and Nur, 1996).
Reference:

Aydin, A., Borja, R., Eichhubl, P., 2006. Geological and mathematical framework for failure modes in granular rock. Journal of Structural Geology 28 (1): 83-98.

Borradela, G.J., 1981. Particulate flow of rock and the formation of cleavage. Tectonophysics 72: 305-321.

Du Bernard, X., Maerten, F., 2001. Dynamic Element Modeling of Stress Field and Arrangement Evolutions Within a Quartz Grain Aggregate. Stanford Digital Repository. Available at: http://purl.stanford.edu/vj755vz8779.

Dvorkin, J., Nur, A., 1996. Elasticity of high-porosity sandstones: Theory for two North Sea data sets. Geophysics 61 (5): 1363-1370.

Eichhubl, P., Du Bernard, X., 2002. Fluid Flow Properties of Deformation Band Faults: Effects of Loading Conditions, Sandstone Composition, and Burial Diagenesis. Stanford Digital Repository. Available at: http://purl.stanford.edu/rt844xf0624.

Gallagher, J.J., 1987. Fractography of sand gain broken by Uniaxial compression. In Marshal. J.R. (Ed.), Clastic Particles. Van Nostrand Einhold Company, Amsterdam.

Mair, K., Main, I., Elphick, S., 2000. Sequential growth of deformation bands in the laboratory. Journal of Structural Geology 22: 25–42.



Readme    |    About Us    |    Acknowledgement    |    How to Cite    |    Terms of Use    |    Ⓒ Rock Fracture Knowledgebase