Rock Fracture
KNOWLEDGEBASE
  

Faulting by Shale Smearing

Shale smearing refers to the process of incorporation and attenuation of shale into the fault zone accompanying normal faulting. The product of this process is called shale or clay smearing. For a recent review of the topic, please see Vrolijk et al. (2016).

Shale smearing occurs by the deformation of alternating brittle and ductile (normally shale) layers. The fundamental cause of shale smear is that shale can behave in a ductile manner. If shale is not ductile when deformed, it will behave just like another rock type in a brittle deformation field. At the same token, though called shale smear, the same process can involve other ductile materials such as limestone, salt, and even chert, not necessarily shale. The contrast in the mechanical properties of these layers leads to differences in their reaction to deformation: shale behaving in a ductile manner while surrounding layers fail in a brittle manner.

When a brittle fracture encounters a ductile layer (Figure 1a), there is an out-of-plane offset across the ductile layer. The magnitude of the offset or more precisely step, is dependent on the thickness of the ductile layer. For detailed discussion about offset across ductile layers, please see 'Growth of Joints across Brittle Ductile Interlayers.'

Conceptual model showing temporal evolution of a fault across a single shale layer. (a) Initiation of brittle faulting in lower brittle unit. (b) Ductile deformation of shale and segmentation of the fault across the shale unit. (c) Stretching as well as attenuation of the shale along an extensional relay. (d) Disconnected smeared shale by linkage of echelon normal fault segments across the smeared shale body. From Aydin and Eyal (2002).Figure 1. Conceptual model showing temporal evolution of a fault across a single shale layer. (a) Initiation of brittle faulting in lower brittle unit. (b) Ductile deformation of shale and segmentation of the fault across the shale unit. (c) Stretching as well as attenuation of the shale along an extensional relay. (d) Disconnected smeared shale by linkage of echelon normal fault segments across the smeared shale body. From Aydin and Eyal (2002).

The offset in an extensional normal faulting environment allows shale to be incorporated into the fault zone (Figure 1b). So, shale smearing occurs only in extensional relays. This will also lead to abrupt discrete separation of the fault segments within brittle layers. Shale in the fault zone is stretched parallel to the fault and thins perpendicular to the fault as slip increases (Figure 1c) until a critical point where the continuity of the shale in the fault zone breaks down (Figure 1d).

In multiple brittle and ductile sequences (Figure 2), when the vertical component of the fault slip exceeds the thickness of a brittle layer, the shale above and below the brittle layer will be in physical contact. Thus, the smeared shales from different units merge together forming a composite fault rock along the fault relay. Once different smeared shales merge, the composite fault rock behaves in a manner similar to that of a single shale smear.

Conceptual model for the development of shale smearing and fault segmentation along the dip direction in multilayered sand/shale sediments in the Niger Delta. (a) Fault segmentation and extensional relays. (b) The smeared shales are associated with the extensional relays and stretch along and thin across the fault as slip increases. The individual sand horizons are in contact across the fault for throws less than the thickness of the sand unit. (c) Neighboring shaley fault rocks merge to form layered composite fault rock as the throw exceeds the thicknesses of sand layers between the neighboring shale units. (d) The thinner shale (top layer) is broken up at this stage, which results in the merger of the two bounding fault segments. From Koledoye, et al. (2003).Figure 2. Conceptual model for the development of shale smearing and fault segmentation along the dip direction in multilayered sand/shale sediments in the Niger Delta. (a) Fault segmentation and extensional relays. (b) The smeared shales are associated with the extensional relays and stretch along and thin across the fault as slip increases. The individual sand horizons are in contact across the fault for throws less than the thickness of the sand unit. (c) Neighboring shaley fault rocks merge to form layered composite fault rock as the throw exceeds the thicknesses of sand layers between the neighboring shale units. (d) The thinner shale (top layer) is broken up at this stage, which results in the merger of the two bounding fault segments. From Koledoye, et al. (2003).
Reference:

Aydin, A., Eyal, Y., 2002. Anatomy of a normal fault with shale smear: Implications for fault seal. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 86 (8): 1367-1381.

Eichhubl, P., D'Onfro, P.S., Aydin, A., Waters, J., McCarty, D.K., 2005. Structure, petrophysics, and diagenesis of shale entrained along a normal fault at Black Diamond Mines, California-Implications for fault seal. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 89 (9): 1113-1137.

Koledoye, B., Aydin, A., May, E., 2003. A new process-based methodology for analysis of shale smear along normal faults in the Niger Delta. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 87 (3): 445 - 463.

Vrolijk, P., Urai, J.L., Kettermann, M., 2016. Clay smear: Review of mechanisms and applications. Journal of Structural Geology 86: 95-152.

Yielding, G., Freeman, B., Needham, T., 1997. Quantitative fault seal prediction. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 81, 897– 917.

Younes, A.I., Aydin, A., 1998. Gulf of Suez Field Trip Guidebook. The Stanford Shale Smear Project 1998 Field Trip Guide. Stanford Digital Repository. Available at: http://purl.stanford.edu/jp025yc8745.



Readme    |    About Us    |    Acknowledgement    |    How to Cite    |    Terms of Use    |    Ⓒ Rock Fracture Knowledgebase