Rock Fracture
KNOWLEDGEBASE
  

Slip Distribution along Faults with Unidentified Formation Mechanism

Displacement or slip varies along a fault trace for both single-segment faults and faults with multiple segments. For faults composed of a single segment, in general, displacement is maximum around the middle of the fault and decreases towards the end. For faults with multiple segments, Dawers and Anders (1995) showed slip distribution data from field observations for two normal faults (Figure 1). Despite the irregularities in the fault geometry, it can be recognized that 1) the point of maximum fault slip is generally not located at the center of a fault or fault segment; 2) the central part of the fault has more symmetric slip distributions; 3) the fault overlap area has steeper slip gradients; and 4) the central part has the steepest average slip gradients. Willemse (1994, 1995) and Willemse et al. (1996) used numerical analyses of fault interaction to analyze the fault slip distribution data. Their analysis indicated that interaction between neighboring faults and fault segments is an important factor in the slip distribution.

Displacement distribution along normal fault arrays indicating kinematic coherence. (a) Slip distribution along normal fault array in the Arley coal seam in Nook Colliery, U.K. (after Walsh and Watterson, 1990). (b) Slip distribution along echelon normal fault array in the Bishop Tuff, California (after Dawers and Anders, 1995). Total slip across the entire array has the appearance of one larger faullt. The slip minima are associated with the relay structures. Modified from Willemse (1994, 1995).Figure 1. Displacement distribution along normal fault arrays indicating kinematic coherence. (a) Slip distribution along normal fault array in the Arley coal seam in Nook Colliery, U.K. (after Walsh and Watterson, 1990). (b) Slip distribution along echelon normal fault array in the Bishop Tuff, California (after Dawers and Anders, 1995). Total slip across the entire array has the appearance of one larger faullt. The slip minima are associated with the relay structures. Modified from Willemse (1994, 1995).
Reference:

Cowie, P.A., Shipton, Z.K., 1998. Fault tip displacement gradients and process zone dimensions. Journal of Structural Geology 20 (8): 983-997.

Dawers, N., Anders, M., 1995. Displacement-length scaling and fault linkage. Journal of Structural Geology 17 (5): 607 MAY 1995.

Walsh, J.J., Watterson, J., 1991. Geometric and kinematic coherence and scale effects in normal fault systems. In the Geometry of Normal Faults, eds A.M. Roberts, G. Yielding and B. Freeman. Geological Society of London Special Publication 56: 193-203.

Willemse, E.J.M, 1994. The geometry and mechanics of segmented normal faults. Stanford Digital Repository. Available at: http://purl.stanford.edu/tf805pm9616.

Willemse, E.J.M, 1995. Growth and scaling of segmented normal faults and consequences for juxtaposition sealing. Stanford Digital Repository. Available at: http://purl.stanford.edu/gk126vs6279.

Willemse, E.J.M, Pollard, D.D., Aydin, A., 1996. Analysis of the relationship between slip distribution and 3D echelon fault geometry with consequences for fault scaling. Journal of Structural Geology 18 (2-3): 295-309.



Readme    |    About Us    |    Acknowledgement    |    How to Cite    |    Terms of Use    |    Ⓒ Rock Fracture Knowledgebase